Posted by Allan Chochinov | 2 Mar 2009
|
Comments (1)

Steve's got yet another page-turner at Interactions:
But as we are supposedly increasingly enlightened and empowered as consumers, where do we draw the line with what advertisers are allowed to do? A couple of years ago I was back in my hometown of Toronto. Walking down Bloor St. late one night, we were invited into the cinema for a free screening at a documentary film festival. The emcee introduced the movie and thanked the sponsor, then introduced the director for a few questions, and then rolled the film. We got the usual film-festival promo trailer, a few acknowledgments screens, and then an ad for Cadillac, the sponsor. The audience began to boo. And while I wouldn't normally do this, I shouted out against the booing, "You're seeing a free movie, so shut the $@^& up!" The exchange (watch an ad, see a movie) seemed perfectly reasonable, and the booing seemed more like hipsters on autopilot ("advertising = teh suck - pwn3d") than a considered objection. Sure, I have all the latest ad-blocking software in Firefox, but I'm not joining the Billboard Liberation Front or subscribing to Adbusters. I'm happy to limit my exposure but don't generally need to become an activist either.
Comments
Steve, YES!
I've felt this way about ads on the subway for years now. There's people that tape communist (I kid you not) posters over the ads on the subway in Montreal. I always make an effort to pull them off.
Also, I attended an art conference last week. One of the artists presented this project of figurines of Chinese workers all lined up in factories. The figurines reminded me of really bad-taste, racist depictions of Asians from 60+ years ago. It was the only project I didn't clap for, and it ended up getting the biggest applause. Perhaps I just didn't get it, but I was really upset...