Earlier this week, we were interested to hear responses to the question "Why Do You Post on the Discussion Boards?"; as the week draws to a close, we have a good example of why: a link to a recent 60 Minutes segment with David Kelley of IDEO has once again raised questions about "design thinking." Ray Jepson offers a fair assessment of the piece (spoiler alert): "I thought the whole piece was too much, 'this guy knew Steve Jobs.' A little too fluff, but always good to see ID in the news."
In any case, I recommend watching the 12-minute video in full before heading over to the discussion:
He saw what was most interesting about the new electronic things in California was going to be software. He didn't want to leave it to the engineers. He wanted the designers to do it. He called it "soft face": software interface. I thought that was a crazy name, but it grew into interaction design.
Last year, on my 60th birthday, he couldn't be here but he went into Central Park and dressed up as a penguin and made a video. He had a fascination with video as painting a picture of the future. I think he saw the designer's role as painting a picture of the future, which is so inherently positive. You have to be positive if you're all about the future.
In memoriam, we invite readers/viewers to revisit Bill's impassioned response to Don Norman's polemic "Design Thinking: A Useful Myth," both published in these pages in 2010, and (given the discussion unfolding in the forums) as yet unresolved. Michael DiTullo, for one, rejects the accusation that consultancies now simply aim to please clients, channeling his mentor Paul Bradley: "Ideas can not be innovative. Innovation only happens with proven behavior change of the end user, and to do that, you have to make something."