Core77

The 2022 Olympic Torches are Designed to Transfer the Flame by Interlocking Like a Handshake

Going for symbolism has led to weird UX

By Rain Noe - February 2, 2022

in UX

During the torch relays that kick off each Olympics, the flame is normally transferred from runner to runner like this:

But for the 1992 Summer Olympics, host city Barcelona added a twist. The torch relay was concluded in spectacular fashion: Rather than the final runner stepping up to the cauldron to light it, the flame was instead transferred by torch to an arrow nocked by archer Antonio Rebollo. Rebollo then fired it high into the air, perfectly arching it right into the cauldron, which then lit amidst thunderous applause. If you've not seen this moment, here it is:

Sadly, now that I'm not watching it on a tiny tube TV from across the room, I can see it was cooked. If you go frame-by-frame you can see the cauldron ignite before the arrow reaches it, and the flame doesn't originate from where the arrow lands.

However, Rebollo certainly hit the target. Had he visibly missed, it would have been spectacularly embarrassing (imagine if he shanked it into the crowd!). I was in awe that the organizers chose such a risky flame-transferring method when the entire world was watching.

Today the 2022 Olympic torch relay begins, and host Beijing has also opted for an unusual flame transfer method—not for the final cauldron lighting, but for the runner-to-runner exchanges. Torch designer Li Jianye has shaped the tip of the torch in a spiral, which itself resembles a flame:

On the graphic explaining the design of the torch, take a look at the lower right corner:

As the Olympics website explains, "A unique feature of the torch will be on display during the Olympic Torch Relay, as torchbearers will be able to exchange the flame by interlocking the two torches via the 'ribbon' construction, symbolizing Beijing 2022's vision to 'promote mutual understanding and respect between different cultures'."

I couldn't find any video footage of practice runs demonstrating how this would work. But this being 2022, the torch itself has its own 90-second sizzle reel on YouTube, and within it is several seconds of this animation:

That actually looks like a rather clunky procedure to coordinate, particularly after a long jog. To achieve the "handshake" both runners have to have the torches both aligned and properly rotated.

UX aside, I'm sure Li meant well by introducing the symbol of a handshake, but the tensions of our times are overshadowing the symbolism. The U.S and Britain have refused to send delegates over human rights concerns, athletes traveling to Beijing have been advised to use burner phones rather than bring their hackable smartphones, NBC isn't sending announcers due to COVID concerns, the NHL isn't sending players, et cetera.

The torch, then, is a perfect fit for our times: The designer meant well, but no one seems to have noticed, and it hasn't had any effect on events.

o
3

Favorite This
Q
4

Comment

Comments

Stewie Griffin

3 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

I found the video I was talking about: https://twitter.com/AvatarDomy2/status/1485499151500693505
It has footage from outside the stadium and at the 35 second mark it shows it from outside the stadium.

!Report as spam
Stewie Griffin

3 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

The arrow never went into the cauldron. It went OVER it and ignited the gasses. That's why it seems like the timing was off, but it wasn't. This article shows a picture where you can see the path of the arrow: https://olympics.com/en/news/snapped-the-flaming-arrow-at-the-olympic-games-barcelona-1992
I even saw a video from outside the stadium that showed it, but I can't seem to find it at the moment.

!Report as spam
Billy Mack

3 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

Looks like the intended method is not being practiced. Unintuitive perhaps.

!Report as spam
Kevin Stohlmeyer

3 years ago

Z

Z

Reply

The arrow's flame lit the gas stream coming out of the torch as it flew by, it didn't need to land in the cauldron. Here's an explanation of the plan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLYxxE4CR1M

!Report as spam