Educated consuming is one thing; sleuthing out clever design tactics is quite another. On the Today Show yesterday I witnessed what was probably a eureka moment for a packaging designer. Through tricking consumers into buying less, at the same price, new packaging has created a design solution to corporate cutback. The segment referenced a few leading brands:
Skippy reduced their peanut butter 2oz by changing the shape of the bottle, only noticeable if you look from the bottom...on the shelf, it's the same as usual. (By the way, still the same price!)
Apple Jacks reduced their contents from 11oz to 8.7oz. From the front, the old and the new look exactly the same, but from a profile comparison, not so. Again, still the same price.
Kleenex has reduced the size of their tissues from 8.4in x 8.4in to 8.2 x 8.4. Seems like a small change, but at their production rate, that's a lot of $not.
Tropicana reduced their orange juice containers by 7 ounces. They say, "new packaging," not "less product" of course.
Without old boxes in the stores or at home with which to make comparisons, these changes are hard to spot with our plain eyes. John Gorval, Marketing professor at Harvard Business School (who studied consumer sensitivity to price vs. package size) says, "If you ask most people what a bag of potato chips cost, they're pretty good at giving a number, ask them how much is contained in that package, my guess is that they have no idea."
Frito Lay says their "weight out" project earned them "double-digit profit growth." "Raising the prices would probably have created the opposite effect," says Gorval.
Perhaps however, things just got too big, and now we have to use crafty design tricks to fool ourselves back to healthy serving sizes? Leave your comments; this could get juicy.
Don't have an account? Join Now
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
More green advocates should take note of this, instead of getting companies to take a loss in quality or cost to get subsidies from the government we should just make green packaging more profitable.
The Brazilian laws which 'Paulo Cholla' pointed out should be adopted and implemented on a much larger scale.
I'm not saying the parent companies aren't happy to disguise some profit, but it might not be a completely malicious strategy.
nice post! ;)
I think the most important idea is to educate people about the effects of packaging design.
Many products use the packaging tricks to actually decrease the volume of the packages, but still visually appearing the same size, if not larger in some cases. but it is fully up to consumers to be responsible for what they buy. I can't deny that it is a bad trick when a company decreases volume to make some more money, but people need to be accountable for what they purchase.