Though the phrase "Design Thinking" has been gaining in popularity for the better part of the last decade, it really entered the mainstream design vernacular last year with the introduction of several articles and books on the topic from designers and educators such as Tim Brown, Roger Martin, Roberto Verganti and Harmut Esslinger.
Unfortunately, judging by a popular January 9th New York Times article, very little has trickled into a mainstream conversation. The article, entitled "Multicultural Critical Theory. At B-School?," attempts to tackle the shifting landscape of MBA business education by using Roger Martin and the Rotman School of Management as a case study but actually frames the argument not around "design thinking," which has been his main selling point for rotman, but rather around "critical thinking." The article goes on to elaborate on the specific practice of "Design Works" at Rotman but uses this as the one single "design thinking" example among a list of other programs. As I read this article, I was surprised that one of "design thinking's" biggest champions seemed to be proselytizing a new definition for his maverick approach in arguably the most prominent article to date. Has the fuse already run out on "design thinking," just like when Bruce Nussbaum announced the death of innovation in late 2008?
What I am trying to get at here isn't really a question of whether or not it matters if a "design" leader adjusts their language but rather to pose the question of why we concern ourselves in believing that any of these ideas are actually crafted to help promote design as a discipline in organizations and not simply promoting the individuals who espouse them.
When compared to the established educational and intellectual design ideologies, "Design Thinking" seems to lack the depth to promote design or designers in business organizations; perhaps it is simply another buzz phrase enlisted to differentiate and highlight an upcoming trend in business. Design should never be trivialized to a two-word catch-all for representing what we as designers have always brought to the table. Unfortunately, within the current economic environment, the concept seems to fit nicely as a neat solution to our problems. Seasoned design professionals and educators find themselves affirming this idea, adopting it as a new direction, fully aware that "design thinking" is something that they have always done.
The real answers for designers' concerns will never be drawn from the work of a few individuals at the top of the field but instead by the empowerment of our own practice to move ourselves into positions in a world where we can productively influence business. The broken paradigms of business will not change unless designers rise to their potential and those involved embrace us as equals on real actionable terms.
Join over 240,000 designers who stay up-to-date with the Core77 newsletter.
Test it out; it only takes a single click to unsubscribe