Rethinking Design Thinking

• 

  Antony Upward

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Don,
  
  So how could designers, collaborating using effective design thinking, solve our biggest and most challenging problems in the world today - climate change, poverty, education, water - i.e. all the things which mean our society is clearly not sustainable?
  
  Some designers, like myself and MIT scholar John Ehrenfeld (author of Sustainability by Design) are already working on these problems. Not just at the product and UX level - but at larger levels of organizational design, process design, business model design. How do design principles, such as the ones you espouse, work in this context?
  
  I believe your work and John's could be highly mutually supportive in accelerating the use of design thinking to help achieve John's definition of sustainability: "the possibility that human and other life might flourish forever".
  
  As a result of a recently blog post of mine (http://blog.edwardjames.biz/2013/03/collaborating-designers.html) John Ehrenfeld has now read your most recent book "living with complexity" and would be interested in a dialogue (see the comments he posted on the blog entry)
  
  Are you game?
  
  Warm regards, looking forward to the 2013 DOET - my 1990 copy is looking very dog eared from use!
  
  Antony Upward
  Sustainability Business Architect

  !Report as spam
• 

  Michael Garcia Novak

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Welcome back Don!!!!!!! You are still one of my favorite authors (again). Very brave to change your mind, DT will redefine what design means. In the future, design (thinking) will be a synonym for intelligence.

  !Report as spam
• 

  c3

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  MART;)
  
  if the right tool is for the right job...then as you lay out conceptually.... Design is in some serious need of thought;)
  
  Design as a medium... clearly has some ID problems.;)
  
  Nothing new.
  
  

  !Report as spam
• 

  JoshTheOrange

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Jedi Master Prof. Norman,
  Your ideas have guided me since the beginning. A challenge after my own 25 years of practice has been maintaining a healthy, ignorant approach to each new problem. Your article reminds me how important this is, and refreshes my resolve to continue working in this way. And the courage you display by honestly readdressing your own ideas and continuing to seek truth in design is refreshing in today's know-it-all world. Your humility is inspiring. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

  !Report as spam
• 

  Craighton

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  You may (proudly) call yourself a designer now Don, but I would hold off on calling yourself an op-ed journalist for now.

  !Report as spam
• 

  Mart

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Agree especially with your Stupid Questions point. I think design thinking is sorely lacking in software though - at least pro software like OS's and suites like Adobe or Microsoft of Autodesk produce. Their lack of usability shows a complete indifference to paying heed to Stupid Questions or to what people actually have to suffer when using their products. Software designers are no more than programmers who've been promoted, and in my opinion programmers have the lowest professional standards of workmanship I can think of. Many of us depend on software like this to make a living, and thus we are dependent ultimately on the work of programmers who really don't give a crap if their work is usable or not. "Does it function?" "Yes - meets minimum requirements" "Is it usable?" "Not my job"

  !Report as spam
• 

  Rob Curedale

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Design Thinking is an evolution of earlier design movements such as User-Centered design.The process may be able to find a better balance between business, technology, people and environmental factors than was previously possible through a more effective cross disciplinary collaborative process.
  
  I agree with Bill's comment that most people do not yet understand the value of Design Thinking and Roger Martin's view that those future organizations that can harness abductive reasoning through Design Thinking will have a competitive business advantage and are more likely to design useful products, services and experiences.

  !Report as spam
• 

  c3

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  beyond the "naming gaming" it is interesting that you end up talking Moggridge and not Kelly, who's recent 60 minutes "commercial" for Apple. etc;) was editing to reflect the name gaming of "Design Thinking" as a process only done "well" by the COLLECTIVE and not an INDIVIDUAL...which of course is horse hockey and just a reflection of the California tech biz myths and those bill payers ego systems or beliefs.
  
  then again why think when apple/autosesk/abode or google will do it for you.;) and that sadly ,truly has been the larger 25 year truth for the "designers thinking".

  !Report as spam
• 

  Gregg Gullickson

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Nice article. The power of stupid questions - I think I'll re-read Argyris's "Teaching Smart People How to Learn."
  
  Virtualizing the workplace and time management challenges still hamper design thinking taking root in many organizations.

  !Report as spam
• 

  Emmanuel Gobillot

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  The more I look at what we have come to call design thinking the more I am reminded of learning theories.
  
  The design process described by so many is what others (notably kolb) identified some time ago as the learning process.
  
  That this process is not always present in organisations won't come as a surprised to a lot of us who still see the so called learning organisation as an elusive concept in many of today's corporations.
  
  This is in no way a criticism of designers who have managed to make a concept resonate far better than many psychologists had (which I guess is a good thing given their job is to make things resonate). It is just meant as a thought to add to discussions.
  
  Thank you as always for provoking thinking in others and your continued work.

  !Report as spam
• 

  Kevin McCullagh

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Hi Don,
  
  It's always refreshing to follow the way you fearlessly challenge your own ideas, as well as those of others.
  
  While Design Thinking proved the most potent pitch of design to business in history, I'm not a fan—although I do think the best designers do have something very special to offer.
  
  Never mind the woolliness of its many definitions, design thinkers have struggled to deliver on their overblown promises in practice. Former evangelists like Bruce Nussbaum have distanced themselves from the idea—calling it a 'failed experiment'.
  
  A pioneering client of Design Thinking in the UK is Geoff Mulgan—one time advisor to Tony Blair—who experimented with design for social innovation, and now warns of design becoming the 'fad that failed'. He gives a few reasons why, including a process essentially developed for product design being over stretched to a wide range of applications. He also fingers designers' naivety in the fields they often tackle under the guise of Design Thinking. For him asking stupid questions, have hit designer's credibility in the real world. Definitely worth a read:
  
  http://www.nesta.org.uk/library/documents/
  GMDesignWhatWorksWhatCouldWorkBetter.pdf
  
  Let the debate roll...

  !Report as spam
• 

  Paul Pickard

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Don,
  I re-read the old essay and comments. This strikes a real chord with me, as it is something I have given much of my thinking to since being in school as an undergrad in the late 70's. After nearly 30 years in the field I am only now finding out what I am both good at and what I enjoy. And its two things, and they are seemingly opposites, but in reality they are much the same. I love the "thinking" part, the: "iterative process of Observation, Ideation, Prototype, and Test."
  
  I design and build interactive exhibits for museums, so the other thing I do is the "nuts and bolts" of how do we make this concept come to life and function. In reality I see them as one in the same.
  
  I do however see a very large void in both these areas amongst designers. I find half formed concepts that have never been vetted out in the real world and a lack of understanding of physical and mechanical properties of how the final thing would work. This is honestly not meant as a tirade of "nobody knows anything anymore." Yet...too often I have been part of projects where an idea just keep getting moved along by momentum of deadlines and in the end everyone stands back and wonders "what happened?"
  
  What happened is exactly your point, no one asked the stupid questions, no one observed, idea-ted, tested and prototyped.
  
  Finally...I have long thought that the "thinking" part is not exclusive to designers, or that it should not be anyway. My wife is a professor in the sciences and through much discussion over the years shares much of my thoughts about "design" thinking. We started these discussions because I was shocked to find that many of her scientist colleagues had no sense of that whatsoever. They are so narrowed down in their research that it appears they have lost the ability to open up and look around. I have this idea to develop a workshop to teach "Design Thinking" for scientists.
  
  In my own career I have struggled with that I know I have the grasp on the "thinking" part...but have been overshadowed by those that were better "designers" if you know what I mean. And its hard to show a portfolio of "good thinking."
  
  BTW DOET was one of my favorites books, I'd walk around telling anyone who might listen,"see, THIS is what I mean"
  
  Thanks for the update on your thoughts,
  
  Paul

  !Report as spam
• 

  Elizabeth Guffey

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  I very much enjoyed reading these reflections on your evolving position on design and so-called "stupid questions." For more on "rethinking design thinking," I would also point to Lucy Kimbell's article "Rethinking Design Thinking," recently published in Design and Culture:
  
  
  http://www.designstudiesforum.org/journal-articles/rethinking-design-thinking-part-i-2/
  
  
  
  

  !Report as spam
• 

  stefanie

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  My heart just fluttered. Don is finally on our team!
  
  *sneaky plug*
  
  http://ithinkidesign.wordpress.com/

  !Report as spam
• 

  Niti Bhan

  7 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Thank you for your wisdom, insight and for showing us how to ever keep learning and evolving. Even our own dearly held thoughts are but prototypes, to be responsive to the data that comes in from the real world tests.
  
  Kiitos,
  Niti

  !Report as spam