12 Comments

• 

  J

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  It's not owning or storing books, it's reading them!!! One of my childhood memories is each member of the family with a book, lying on a sofa during those lazy and long summer afternoons.
  Why we were reading instead of playing video games? Nobody told us to read, but you copy what your family do.
  Said that, yes, I've always been sourrounded by more than one bookcase. Easy access to books encourages reading, kind of obvious, don't?

  !Report as spam
• 

  Jennifer R

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  I wonder how much of it is the fact that if you are willing to buy books instead of getting them from the library, you revere knowledge more? Lots of people don't have the space for two bookshelves -- or the money to buy that many books -- unless they rid themselves of other things, such as comfy couches or large screen TVs.

  !Report as spam
• 

  DD

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  People who own lots of books are smarter than people who do not. Intelligent people have smarter children than stupid people.
  
  Did the study control for that?

  !Report as spam
• 

  judi

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  dmarcy is exactly right. We are a low income family but we accumulate books like crazy. We scour yard sales, use paperback book swap, thrift stores and freecycle to obtain books and liberally use the public library. That is because we value learning and gaining information. That value is what predicts success in school. Handing a low income family some free books doesn't give them that value. If they don't have that value they won't pass it on to their children even if they're convinced to read to their kids every day and that means they're children are less likely to do well in school.

  !Report as spam
• 

  NaDell

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Libraries are wonderful if you don't want to purchase hundreds of books! You can even keep them on your bookcase for three weeks until they are due and your child will always have something new to learn and to challenge their mind.
  

  !Report as spam
• 

  DMarcy

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Commenter Jeff seems to be saying that money ("the ability to buy the books") is what makes the difference here. But in fact, many families (including the one I grew up in) make significant sacrifices in order to have two or more bookshelves full of books. We did not have a TV when I was growing up, until my aunt felt sorry for us when I was 9 and gave us a tiny black-and-white 9-inch - but we had books, because we valued knowledge. We didn't buy store-bought cereal; sometimes we qualified for free lunches; we wore hand-me-down and thrift-store clothes (almost never new) - but we had books, becausebooks and learning and knowledge were important.
  
  
  Those families who were given books had books, but they didn't value knowledge, so the books had no effect on the kids' success n school. How many of those homes had TV's? How many had video games?
  
  As my parents used to tell us, it's not about how much money you have; it's about the choices you make about what you do with that money. Those choices are based on and reflect your family's values - and those values have a lot to do with how well the kids do in school.

  !Report as spam
• 

  Namo

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Yes, we have lots of books. More than we have bookshelves. But we also have other interests - drawing, painting, making stuff, gardening, playing, music...but I do not insist on the children performing well at school, since I think the emphasis in the education system is skewed, and I'm very sure they'll do well in whatever interests them...

  !Report as spam
• 

  John Halbig

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  The funniest thing about this article is that I actually OWN a few "Billy" bookcases.
  
  But I get it -- the idea that, if you think books are important enough that you need bookcases to hold them, then you value reading in some way. Learning to read (and, by indirect inference, learning to write) involves a lot of the skills that can be applied to almost any learning discipline.

  !Report as spam
• 

  Jeff Milner

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  "as it turns out, folks who like to read are more predisposed to see to it that their children do well in school."
  
  There are no studies that indicate actually reading the books is important. Just being able to buy the books is the important part.
  
  It is possible for parents that value knowledge and are successful in life to afford books but don't necessarily need to read them to their kids in order for their kids to grow up to be successful and value knowledge (just like their parents).
  
  There was a study in the states where low-income families were given free books and it made no difference whether the families read the books to the kids or not, they still didn't fair any better in school. (See the book Freakonomics or check out their blog post on the topic: http://www.freakonomics.com/2007/06/15/the-benefits-of-reading-to-children-tested-by-a-data-pool-of-one/)

  !Report as spam
• 

  Paul

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  Commenter Zack should rethink his question in terms of physical objects, like e-readers and tablets, something that a person would have with them vs on a bookshelf. And consider the value of books, as with vinyl records, of a historical narrative of a person or a family through generations. If I have books on a shelf that belonged to my parents or theirs, as well as my own accumulation of books, that tells a different story than a technology that's less than a decade old.
  
  As someone pointed out to me the other week, e-readers won't make all books obsolete. They will replace the titles of the moment, the best sellers or compulsive reads like pulps and serial fiction. But there will always be some titles that will have to exist in the physical world, left open on a table or browsed regularly.

  !Report as spam
• 

  Lorry Man

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  damn I guessed Whiskey and Ferret.

  !Report as spam
• 

  Zack

  5 years ago

  Z

  Z

  Reply
  I'm interested in seeing if this relationship would hold true for ebooks, as it seems those may slowly replace the traditional style of books.

  !Report as spam