e
Rain's Weekly Design Minutiae: Environmental Disaster, Neatly Packaged
This one's to do with the design of a system rather than an object
I ordered two items from Staples and they arrived today. Here they are, the boxes laid on a grid of inches for scale.
Enter a caption (optional)Inside the first box are paper towels that fit the dispenser in my photo studio. The box is perfectly sized to the amount of paper towels within, there's not a wasted inch.
Enter a caption (optional)Opening the second box, we see a strip of plastic air pockets…
Enter a caption (optional)…protecting the cargo within.
Enter a caption (optional)
Enter a caption (optional)Below is the amount of materials required to ship me this SR44 battery for my digital calipers.
Enter a caption (optional)The battery is small enough that I could swallow it but the box it came in is larger than my head.
Enter a caption (optional)So why is it packaged this way, because Staples loves wasting cardboard and plastic? No. Either they or whomever they've subcontracted their fulfillment out to undoubtedly has some warehouse system in place, a series of pickers, packagers, conveyor belts, automatic labelers, scanning machines and vehicle-loading infrastructure, that is designed to handle cardboard boxes of sizes common to the majority of their wares.
At some point a Staples bean counter undoubtedly realized that the above-depicted scenario would take place. And realized that because of the scale that they're operating at, it doesn't matter. With their expensive and efficient systems in place, it would cost them more money to have someone pop the battery in a small padded envelope, write my address on it with a Bic pen, slap a couple stamps on it and walk it over to a U.S.P.S. mailbox. And their protocols prevent them from opening the paper towel box, dropping the battery in there and taping the box back up.
I'm sure they've figured out the macro stuff, and that their system is somehow the least wasteful when viewed from 10,000 feet. At least, that's what I want to believe. It's just hard to swallow that wasting this much material in this individual case is somehow logical.
-
oFavorite This
-
Q11Comment
Directory Company Profiles
Core77
Industrial Design
Resources
Industrial Design
Resources
-
Core77 Directory
Find the Best Industrial Design CompaniesGo -
Goddard, Inc.
Goddard Inc. is a full-service engineering and industrial design firm specializing in the developmen...
-
Copenhagen Institute of Interaction DesignCopenhagen Institute of Interaction Design (CIID) is an international hub of creative minds. We shar...
-
Agncy Design
Using design as a tool to reduce structural inequity. We work with teams and leaders to make the equ...
-
Fresco Design
Fresco supports world-class brands with world-class design. Based in the Boston area, we provide est...
-
Kritzer Design Studio | KDS
Based in Seattle, WA. Kritzer Design Studio | KDS specializes in providing award winning industrial ...
-
Y Studios
Y Studios is an award-winning Industrial Design and Research consultancy in San Francisco with exten...
-
studioFAR
Established in 2009, studioFAR is a softgoods design firm based in the Mission district of San Franc...
K
{Welcome
Create a Core77 Account
Already have an account? Sign In
By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use
K
Reset Password
Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.
Comments
or you just walk to the store to get a battery...
There is a machine that Staples uses in the process of fulfillment that makes custom boxes. Maybe it is just a matter of time before all shipping boxes are made to fit the contents.
The savings in productivity outweighed the losses in materials. Simple math. Why is that difficult to understand?
I once worked for a tractor parts distributor. We would have items shipped to us in boxes (like gears), and then we would take those boxes, drop them in another box, fill the box with packaging material (in our case, bags we filled with expanding foam), and then ship them to the customer. When I suggested that we skip this step, and just slap our label over the label that was already there, I was told we couldn't do thisbecause, "Some times dealerships like to display the boxes, and this would make it hard for them to display the box."
I couldn't agree with your comments more. This kind of stuff drives me crazy.
I worked as production manager at a large 3d printing service. The goods we had to ship daily also varied drastically, from 1 cm to 1,5 m in size. As cost for shipping with our parcel service was dynamically calculated based on parcel size and weight we tried to keep the packaging size close to a minimum. That meant we spent a lot of time picking the right parcel out and even more importantly we spent a lot of space in storage for the different sized parcels. We basically reduced our stock to three different parcel sizes to simplify the process, which lead to the same results: tiny pieces in overly large parcels, but sadly - cost efficient.
Likewise, my wife received an order from Walmart.com that was packaged with nearly 150 of those inflatable plastic air bags. I took the time to deflate every one, roll them all together, and drop them in the grocery bag recycling box at the grocery store. I couldn't believe the overwhelming amount of packaging.
Cheap laser pointers at in the pet isle at Ace Hardware usually have 3 SR44 batteries by the way.
Typo: "whomever" should be "whoever"
A friend of mine works at Amazon, and I once asked him about this. Apparently, each product is coded with dimensions and there is software that calculates what box should be used. But sometimes the box that is called for is oversized. The problem is that *only a supervisor* can modify the order and choose a better-sized box.
you are hitting on a good point... trucks.... transportation. when it comes to stacking, oversized boxes can save more than time, they could also save a second truckload of 1 off sizes.