Core77

Sign In / Join Now

Topics
- Product Design
- Process
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Business
- News
- Furniture
- Tools
- Transportation
- Education
- Impact
- Reference
- Video
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Subscribe
Features
- Features
- Designing Women
- Getting Hired
- Design Files
- True I.D. Stories
- Sex-tacular
- In the Details
- Photo Galleries
- Bizarre Inventions
- Questionnaire
- Materials
- Footwear
- Hand Tool School
- Tools & Craft
Awards
Careers
- Careers
- Design Jobs;
- Talent Search;
- Design Salaries;
Firms
- Firms
- Search Firms;
- Firm Projects
Forums
- Forums
- General Discussion
- Students & Schools
- Design Employment
- Sketching
- Software & Technology
- All Forums
More...
- About Us
- Contact Us
- Advertise
- About
- Terms of Use
My Account
- My Account
- Sign In / Join Now
Follow Us
- )
- m
- Y
- '
- S
Search
e

Consumer Electronics

As a Luxury Sex Toy Industrial Designer, the Revoked CES Innovation Award Hit Too Close to Home

Examining the unfortunate and obvious gender bias demonstrated by the Consumer Electronics Show

By Ti Chang - January 18

Ti Chang wearing Crave's Vesper vibrator necklace. Photo: Catalina Kulczar.

Ti Chang is the co-founder and VP of Design of Crave, a company that aims to bring luxury and inclusive design to the sex toy industry.

This week, we were disappointed—but not surprised—to learn that the noted Consumer Electronics Show (CES) revoked an Innovation Award they'd given to a sex toy startup. We got the same rejection in 2017 when Crave applied to exhibit at the show. Their official stance is that we are considered "adult entertainment—a category they do not showcase at CES." Unofficially, however, we know this is not true: at CES 2018, a literal sex doll was shown on the floor of CES and AR porn for men was allowed this year, but when an innovative vibrator is banned, this presents a clear double standard.

As an industrial designer who works on products that improve everyday lives, I believe strongly that sexual pleasure is a core part of the human experience, and that the products people use to enhance their pleasure and connect with others are as important, relevant, and meaningful as any other consumer product.

So it's simply absurd that the leading industry showcases can't keep up with the rest of the country—and increasingly the world at large—that are eager to acknowledge pleasure as part of the human experience. When mainstream retailers from Bergdorf Goodman to Urban Outfitters showcase our products next to other beautiful accessories, why is CES so far behind?

Lora DiCarlo's Osé received a CES Innovation Award, but the trade show revoked the honor soon after.

"We see sex used to sell everything from hard drives to hamburgers—everything except the sort of products that actually empower people to explore and express their sexual wellbeing."

To be clear, it's not just CES. The tech community at large, from Facebook to Pinterest and beyond has a set of policies that show a consistent bias against sexual pleasure—well, a consistent bias against female pleasure, that is. On social media, our promoted posts and advertisements are constantly rejected from these platforms, but we see ads for Viagra, lingerie, and other products aimed at male desire all the time. And of course we see sex used to sell everything from hard drives to hamburgers—everything except the sort of products that actually empower people to explore and express their sexual wellbeing.

Crave's Vesper vibrator necklace

It's ironic that these tech companies, who generally tout themselves as progressive and forward thinking, are so far behind the times when it comes to acknowledging pleasure as a vital part of the human experience. Whether they know it or not, these major gatekeepers are perpetuating the shame around female pleasure. To remove this taboo, we think these conversations must take place on larger public stages, which we have worked to bring to mainstream media, world class museums, and events like SXSW. It is in part why we are perplexed that CES, who plays such a crucial role in showcasing innovations that are changing the world, would selectively prohibit brands like Crave that focus on innovation so fundamental to the human experience.

Crave Pocket Vibe

As a prominent voice in sex toy design, I am often asked what the future of sex toys look like. I think it's less about what sex toys look like, per se, but how we redefine our relationships with our bodies to give ourselves permission to touch, love, and play with ourselves. I think the future of sex is a world with more information where we better understand our bodies. Sure, perhaps it would be interesting if you could have sex with a mermaid robot hologram (and maybe you will be able to), but the most transformative future would be in removing the stigma so we can actually better know ourselves and connect with each other. Because all the sex robots or widgets are not going to change much if we believe pleasure is shameful and taboo.

Ti Chang

Ti Chang is an industrial designer and entrepreneur passionate about designing products for women. She is the co-founder and VP of Design of CRAVE, a San Francisco-based company specializing in discreet and beautifully designed luxury sex toys. Ti leads the concept and design for the company’s full line of products, which has won numerous awards including Red Dot, IDEA and Good Design. Prior to Crave, Ti founded INCOQNITO, a line of intimate accessories that double as fashionable jewelry. The company was acquired by CRAVE in 2011. Ti is best known for the design of Vesper, a vibrator necklace, one of the most celebrated and innovative sex toys disrupting the adult toy industry and changing the conversation around sex.

Earlier, Ti held positions with major consumer brands, including Trek Bicycle and Goody Products, where she helped pave the way for women by serving as the first female industrial designer at both Trek and Goody. She is chair of the Women in Design section and the San Francisco Chapter of the Industrial Designers Society of America, where she organizes monthly events to support the community of designers in industrial design in the Bay Area. She is also on the board for San Francisco Design Week.

Ti holds a MA in Design Products from Royal College of Art in London and a BS in Industrial Design from Georgia Institute of Technology. Ti grew up in Atlanta, GA and now enjoys life and work in San Francisco.

16 Comments

Matt Jordan

10 months ago

Z

5Z

Reply

Comparing a virbator add to Viagra and lingerie is an apples to Oranges comparison. It would be more fair to compare it to something like a flesh light, which I see far more adds for vibrators in the general public than a flesh light or anything similar. There are also plenty of ads for things like women's birth control and men's lingerie type underwear (assuming it's strictly for the opposite sex only which is a stretch... I'd say women's lingerie is also for women's pleasure). I simply have a hard time believing there's a bias specifically against women's sex toys and not men's. Is there a bias against explicit sex material in general? Sure, but that's a different discussion.

!Report as spam
- Phoebe DeGroot
  
  Matt Jordan
  
  10 months ago
  
  Z
  
  Z
  
  Reply
  
  A minimalist, elegantly designed silicone object that vibrates is hardly something I would refer to as "explicit sex material"
  
  !Report as spam
- Christine Taylor
  
  Matt Jordan
  
  10 months ago
  
  Z
  
  2Z
  
  Reply
  
  Unfortunately the reasoning found in your comment (Matt Jordan), "I simply have a hard time believing there's a bias specifically against women's sex toys and not men's.", is a part of the problem. In addition, that is not fact based - its opinion.
  
  There is documented proof... evidence that this is happening. How data works for every issues other than women's issues is one that will be dissected someday.
  
  Women (as in hundreds/thousands) have been speaking out against issues similar to this at CES, and elsewhere. I tend to ask the analytical thinker - what kind of evidence do you need so you will believe that this is real?
  
  The Lora DiCarlo team is doing pretty amazing work here in Oregon. That they can turn this incident of clear bias into bringing more awareness around this problem (and their brand), is frankly immensely inspiring. I thank them for it.
  
  I've never see this dialog across so many media channels. It's time for men to start believing this is happening cause you're being left behind while women and people of color unite as they take such issues on and grow past them thus building better companies, better products, and better industries.
  
  !Report as spam
- Maureen Carroll
  
  Matt Jordan
  
  10 months ago
  
  Z
  
  Z
  
  Reply
  
  Matt, the author cites that CES2018 included an actual sex doll. Not a companion, not a conversationalist, but a sex doll with a silicone vagina (among other hyper-realistic details). It's telling that I don't even need to specify "female" sex doll, because we all can rightly assume it's a female doll, designed for men. But a vibrator for women?! We can't have that! So how in the world can you not see the bias?
  
  !Report as spam
Matt Levine

10 months ago

Z

4Z

Reply

It is a lot less strange to look at a vibrator than a robot cadaver for dudes to nut in. lol

!Report as spam
- Ti Chang
  
  Matt Levine
  
  10 months ago
  
  Z
  
  Z
  
  Reply
  
  You are not wrong.
  
  !Report as spam
Rob Podell

10 months ago

Z

3Z

Reply

It sounds more like they have a standard and are not enforcing it uniformly. Whether this is because of gender, who knows, I kind of doubt it.

!Report as spam
Tracey R

10 months ago

Z

1Z

Reply

First off, I would like to give you kudos on your design and would be interested to try it. Personally, I've attended CES for about 15 years and yes, I've seen a lot of products in this category over the years on the show floor (and even saw one company exhibit this year) but they all marketed themselves as "personal massagers" and not sex toys. I obviously didn't see your application so I don't know how it was positioned and branded but I do know that the similar products that exhibited in the past, didn't have a mention of their product being a vibrator or sex toy - it was obvious for consumers looking for a toy but any naive person bought the positioning that it was a massage device. The Hitachi wand is marketed as a massager but we all know that the majority of their sales are all for personal pleasure. I wish that we could all be just straight forward and comfortable to talk about personal pleasure but until the high and mighty suppressive majority of the country is more relaxed, mainstream sex toys for women are more accepted being marketed as personal massagers. I would be interested to know if the CEA gave you any recommendations about positioning it differently so that you could fall within that gray area. Good luck with everything!

!Report as spam
1stlvl Humanoid

10 months ago

Z

1Z

Reply

The standard is very simple. If you are designing something related to sex, it needs to be animatronic, IOT, and in the uncanny valley. Somebody didn't read the CES handbook. I did a quick rendering to help Lora win next year.

!Report as spam
John Hardway

10 months ago

Z

1Z

Reply

When devices that create joy for women can't be honored, when the supreme court blesses discrimination against people born with a gender identity different from their body's gender, when 22 women come forward and he is elected anyway, the gap between real life and The Handmaid's Tale is too damned small.

!Report as spam
Joe Schappler

10 months ago

Z

1Z

Reply

Change happens slowly, especially in industries that can make some people feel uncomfortable. Great awareness article - nice work on the designs as well. they look very high end and high quality.

!Report as spam
Frank Dodd

10 months ago

Z

1Z

Reply

Eye opening article. Thanks for posting it. And now I will share it.

!Report as spam
Robert Wilkey

10 months ago

Z

1Z

Reply

"the most transformative future would be in removing the stigma so we can actually better know ourselves and connect with each other. Because all the sex robots or widgets are not going to change much if we believe pleasure is shameful and taboo."

Ti, I couldn't agree more. The way that we, as a society, tend to shame sex toys in the public view will continue to have a damaging effect on their design evolution and continued improvement. And the way that gender bias is affecting the publicity (and thus, marketing, sales, continued development, etc. etc.) of many of these devices is infuriating.

Thank you for writing this piece, and for doing everything that you do. Hopefully one day soon society will "grow up" and embrace the fact that sex products are an ideal combination of health and leisure design and should be celebrated and promoted rather than blushingly brushed away from public view.

!Report as spam
- Ti Chang
  
  Robert Wilkey
  
  10 months ago
  
  Z
  
  Z
  
  Reply
  
  thank you for the kind words :-)
  
  !Report as spam
Jaycee Stewart

8 months ago

Z

Z

Reply

Well said Ti Chang and really appreciate it. Thanks for sharing anyway.

!Report as spam
Joe van Teylingen

8 months ago

Z

Z

Reply

This stems from the men who had a say in this feeling intimidated & inferior to sex toys. I’m not being obtuse, either. The idea that sex toys might [definitely can] provide more pleasure to women than that group of men could provide was too much for their egos.
This would be hilarious if it wasn’t unfortunate that Ti Chang and her team was not able to introduce their products at CES.
Perhaps it’s time for a trade show with all women run/owned businesses? Call it something like the Electronics Show for All Consumers or eSAC.
A good name, but great acronym considering.....

!Report as spam