NEW YORK DESIGN WEEK 2009
MILAN DESIGN WEEK 2009
PICTOPIA FESTIVAL 2009
HOME AND HOUSEWARES SHOW 2009
TRANSVERSALE 2009
NEW YORK CITY TOY FAIR 2009
IMM COLOGNE INTERNATIONAL FURNISHING SHOW
NORTH AMERICAN INT'L AUTO SHOW '09
TOKYO DESIGN WEEK 2008
LONDON DESIGN FESTIVAL 2008
BICYCLE
100 PERCENT DESIGN SHANGHAI
Posted by Jeannie Choe | 15 Jan 2007
|
Comments (3)
CG kicked off this discussion by expressing his need for a sweet clock radio--snooze being a "must." Why does it seem like clock radios got the shaft as far as good ID goes? Regular clocks are doing quite swimmingly. If it's not straight up fugliness, it's usability, size or shape, fragility (for snooze slammers), or price. If you've got some suggestions, post them in our Cool clock radio? discussion right here.
hot tip from the one and only yo.
NeoCon 2009
MD&M East and ATX 2009
Nidecker Snowboard Design Competition
Tools of Engagement
Comments
What's the one on the left in the graphic in this post?
I think it projects the time onto the ceiling, assuming the ceiling is flat.
The one on the left is a Phillip Starck weather station, clock radio. You can find them cheap at Overstock. I fell in love when I first spotted these a year or so ago and was stoked when I found them on sale and I wondered why they were going for half price. Well, yeah they look sweet and all but when it comes to simple things like, well, most all the basic functions - tuning the radio, changing the time or the batteries it's one of the most unintuitive, cumbersome and poorly designed products I've ever encountered. Maybe I'm just spoiled by the simplicity of my Macs and the ease of putting together Ikea products. All I know is that any and every time I interact with my Starck clock it's like working with left-handed scissors. (I'm right handed by the way.) I still love the way it looks and functions but getting there is a real pain in the ass. You've been warned!
peace,
H. Michael Karshis