"You never see an industrial design student taking engineering courses and vice versa. They work shoulder to shoulder in product development [but] with curriculums as they are, they don't collaborate until they've left school... They have contact with each other on the first day of the job." So says Francis DiBella, director of engineering technology at Northeastern, in "A Focus on Use," an excellent essay on how to fix workflow and communication problems between industrial designers and engineers.
"What's usually happening is designers throw the styling and concept over the wall to the engineers and when they see it the first time, they have to work out all kinds of problems," adds Bill Dresselhaus, principal of consulting firm Dresselhausgroup.
The 2,000-word essay isn't just mere bitching; it contains plenty of ideas for solutions. Cynics will be unsurprised to learn that the education- and technology-based suggestions will not be easy to implement, but then, nothing worth doing ever is. Judge the ideas for yourself here, and if you've got better ones, leave us a comment below.
Dutch Design Week
Prague Design Days
1 Hour Design Challenge Winners!
Coroflot Salary Survey Results
Comments
I think this concept is wonderful, though I was surprised to see that Thilmany failed to mention a field that is entirely devoted to solving this issue: human factors. He touched on the idea by referencing human centered design, however. Known by other names (ergonomics, engineering psychology, etc), this field seeks to understand human capabilities and limitations to help guide the design (and eventual building) processes. It's relatively new, but we working to avoid blunders like the VCR that eternally flashes 12:00...
Carnegie Mellon's Masters in Product Development program has been at this same problem for some time now. Check it out: http://www.mpd.cmu.edu/