FRIEZE NEW YORK 2013
INTERNATIONAL HOME + HOUSEWARES SHOW 2013
TOKYO DESIGN WEEK 2012
BEIJING DESIGN WEEK 2012
The Wright Brothers had a dream that one day, man would fly. Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary has a dream too, which is that one day we'll fly standing up.
In 2010 he proposed the solution you see above, whereby ten rows of seating are replaced by 15 rows of Hannibal-Lecter-on-trial-type apparatuses. These seats—sorry, "stands"—were to be offered at prices so low—just $6 a pop—that passengers would gladly buy them, and probably strap on the Hannibal facemask thingy if they had to.
Choosing between meal options
Airplane manufacturer Boeing shot the idea down, citing European safety regulations. Undeterred, O'Leary then went to the lawmakers. So now he's back in the news, waging a public war with regulators to allow standing-room-only areas on airplanes. His argument is unsurprisingly meeting stiff resistance, probably due to the way he's pursuing it:
Mr O'Leary, the chief executive of budget airline Ryanair, dismissed the notion seatbelts were an essential safety requirement, saying: "If there ever was a crash on an aircraft, God forbid, a seatbelt won't save you.""Seatbelts don't matter," he proclaimed. "You don't need a seatbelt on the London Underground. You don't need a seatbelt on trains which are travelling at 120mph and if they crash you're all dead..."
...When it came to landing, he suggested, passengers could "hang on to the handle" and would be "fine". "If you say to passengers it's £25 for the seat and £1 for the standing cabin, I guarantee we will sell the standing cabin first," he said. "No question."
The idea of standing on an airplane isn't new; a Chinese airline proposed it in 2009, and frankly, having taken mass-transit in China before, I'm surprised they haven't implemented it yet.
I think it's just a matter of time before someone, somewhere starts doing it. But don't worry, overly-officious flight attendants: While you won't be able to nag them to place their seats upright before takeoff and landing, you'll still have something to fuss about. Passengers will undoubtedly decide to sit cross-legged on the floor and you'll have to harangue them into standing back up.
Comments
seatbelts on airplanes aren't for crashes, they're for turbulence, note the lack of shoulder straps
Amazing idea and quite reasonable thinking. When you crash seatbelts won't save you. But standing on an airplane? Well I can't imagine that one.
Back in 2010 we developed a device to arrange passengers at 23" pitch in a half-standing position (by sitting on a rised kind-of saddle). Despite the big attention coming from media, we had almost no interest from Ryanair. This showed that the "standing" issue, as well as the "seatbelt" issue, or the "single pilot" issue; is only a smart way to have free commercials on newspapaer pages. Now I am only waiting for the next announcement: "Noisy kids will be phisically punished by our flight attendants on all flights, said yesterday Mr. O'Leary"
I think this is a good idea.
And why can't it be made safe?
Roller coasters strap people in standing up and throw them around all over the place.
The aviation industry is very safety and lawsuit conscious to the point that new concepts like this are shot down before they're given a chance to get off the ground...
One key question is if a pregnant woman buys a standing up seat, do you have to give up your seat for her?